Please don’t play mind games with your doctor

I have taken this sad truth as a fact of life: most patients that I interview have an incomplete idea of many crucial aspects of their health. They don’t know what tests have been done, what they are for, what medications they are on, what conditions they have… And the list goes on.

Take for example, several weeks ago I interviewed a relatively well educated and intellectually intact patient, and this is how it roughly went:

Me: sir, what medical conditions do you have?

Patient: nothing, I have been healthy.

Me, knowing any question worth asking once is worth asking twice: any medical problems in the past?

Patient: nope.

Me: ok… What about your heart?

Patient: oh yeah, I had a heart attack and almost died 5 years ago.

So I went through the rest of his body systems one by one to help him remember other things like heart attacks that are generally considered “past medical problems”.

Me: ok, sir, do you take any medications?

Patient: no.

Me: nothing? No medications?

Patient: no.

Me: what about the diabetes and high blood pressure you told me about?

Patient: oh yeah I take metformin, metoprolol, candesartan, aspirin, Lipitor…

Me: orz…

Why did you say “no”? What did you think my question meant before? What if I was less patient or busier, and believed your answers when you so definitely gave them?

I don’t think the patients meant to do this on purpose. Usually it is simply miscommunication or something being lost in the language barrier. And sometimes we are at fault for asking unclear, ambiguous, or misleading questions.

But every so often, I can’t help but imagine a patient must be pulling a prank on me when I take a history. Maybe one day I will ask someone about their surgical history and they will say: “nothing, doc.” “And what’s this beeping in your chest?” “JUST KIDDING! I have a robotic heart! :D GOTCHA!!!”

Only in Taiwan

have I seen the following senario so widely accepted to be the norm:

My grandma, who is a happy and pretty healthy 82 year-old, recently had a cough. She has been afebrile, and maintained good hydration and appetite. She has no constitutional symptoms like malaise and weight loss either. Her cough is productive of some yellow phlegm, and it’s been going on for about a week, so she was prescribed some antibiotics and some antitussives, and was asked to follow up in the clinic in 3 days.

Bread and butter primary care, right?

Except she went to a pediatrician‘s office.

And the thing is, I would not have thought twice about this situation a few years ago, because that is really normal in Taiwan where I grew up. There are virtually no family docs (and no patient knows what family docs do even if they see one) on the streets where medical clinics tend to cluster and where patients go see doctors. There is no concept of longitudinal care either; if the doctor in this clinic isn’t helping, patients will go to the next one down the street. (And if all else fails, or if the patients decide the problem is serious enough, they will present to the best tertiary hospital they can get to.)

So that’s what my grandma did after seeing two different pediatricians and still had the cough. She went to an ENT surgeon’s clinic.

Yes. Ear, nose, and throat surgeons who went through years and years of extra surgical training to operate on some of the most vital (airway) and aesthetically important (face) areas of the body are common go-to doctors for mild URTI in Taiwan.

Imagine the hilarity if that happened in Canada. If a 82 year old woman is referred to a pediatrician for a case of mild URTI or bronchitis? Or, heaven forbid, an ENT surgeon? The primary doctor who made the referral would not even be taken seriously enough to be yelled at. The pediatrician’s or ENT’s secretary (or medical office assistant) would probably politely talk to the primary doc’s secretary and ask him or her to check the correct addressee.

Now, this is not a criticism of the patients or the doctors in Taiwan. Both parties are doing what everyone is doing, in a way how everything has been done. In other words, this is the current medical culture of Taiwan, and no one can be faulted for doing things in the most culturally accepted way.

But just because something has always been like that in the past doesn’t mean it should alway be the same in the future. Think about the downside of having streets of medical clinics run by specialists, advertised to be the former attending doctors or even heads of departments of prestigious tertiary hospitals and academic centers, to whom hundreds of ill patients and their worried families present any condition under the sun. The patients have only their understanding of the specialty title to base their self-referral on. “ENT? Sounds like a good doctor for coughing which is kinda in the throat.” “Stomachache? Probably like the ones I had when I was a kid. Let’s see the nice pediatrician who saw little Johnny last week.”

Well, for starters, the specialists would either go mad and burn out (“WHY AM I SEEING 30 CASES OF VIRAL DIARRHEA A DAY AS A COLORECTAL SURGEON!?”) or become content with being a GP. There goes years of intense, valuable specialty training. Also, the patients are probably getting suboptimal care because of their inappropriate self-referral. They can decide that an internist is the best for their child who is vomiting, but the internist may very well not know the complete list of differential diagnoses of pediatric vomiting by heart.

I can probably go on with the problems with the current medical model in Taiwan, but I think you get the idea. The bottom line is, this model probably poses a serious drain on the health care dollar, creates unnecessary confusion and suboptimal care for the patients, and leads to much headaches and burnouts for the doctors.

The big question is, how do we change it?

That, my friend, is a good question. If you can answer it well, you should consider becoming Taiwan’s health minister.

As for me, I just ordered some delish Chinese take out and will be too distracted after the break :)

Yum yum yum yum.

Gender equality

is hard to come by. With an emphasis on “equality”, which I would define as being equal, or the same. In the literal sense, of course male and female cannot be the same, nor is it desirable for male and female to be the same. Gynecomastia, virilization, hirsutism, etc. are symptoms for men and women whose hormone balances tip towards the opposite sex.

Ok, enough tongue-in-cheek. No one means “equality” in its literal sense when they discuss the topic of gender equality. So, what do they really mean?

There is no specialty for which the gender ratio is 50:50. There are more male orthopods, and there are more female ob/gyns. There are more female medical students and general practitioners today, which is a shift from the previous era. Is that inequality? Is it unfair that, under the current admission standard, more female medical students are selected over male ones? Should it be tweaked so that we have a 50:50 split every year?

It turns out that equality is a very difficult notion to define. Perhaps it means that men and women are given equal opportunities, responsibilities, reward, and respect. That is all fine in words but complicated in practice, because men and women are biologically and therefore fundamentally different. The average men have higher water and lean mass content than the average women (actually the medical literature defines “typical men” as white males in their 25-35s or something like that but it works for our argument). The average men have higher testosterone than the average woman. This biological difference results in some phenotypical differences that are fundamental to each gender and therefore difficult to change. Such things include: greater physical strength and higher rate of aggression in the average male, and greater social skills and higher rates of depression in the average female. Note that I have deliberately used the “average” male and female because there are of course variability in each population, and we need to focus our discussion on the populations to avoid “but there are some women who are twice as strong as your skinny ass” type of rebuttal. 

But the fundamental difference between the genders end pretty quickly after basic biology and perhaps some psychology. Beyond that, as we move further away from the XX vs XY end of the divide and closer towards the Office vs Kitchen stereotypes, biology plays a smaller and smaller role. If the average women spend more time in the kitchen than the average men, I’d argue that has to do more with society than with biology. And I’d further argue that since society change as people change, there is no reason why the average women have to spend more time in the kitchen than men. Same goes to earning money. Becoming good doctors. And winning presidential elections.

In other words, I think that differences between men and women are due to two factors: biology and society/environment. (Good old multifactorial, nature vs nurture explanation.) Some differences between genders are more due to biology than society, and some the other way around.

So the issue becomes, what kind of societal pressures is in place to keep men and women live life differently? And which of these pressures are desirable and which are not? For one clear case of societal pressure as example: the guy usually buys the diamond ring and proposes to the girl. Is it a desirable societally-pressured inequality? Should we strive for equality and start a movement where girls propose to guys (with awesome computer gadgets, perhaps)? Another societal and historically based inequality: the baby usually takes on the dad’s last name. Does it have to be that way? Should we make the “family name” the mom’s name or the dad’s name based on a coin toss?

Nah probably not. Either proposal would be kinda weird. But any shifting of paradigm in society would be kinda weird at first, so it being weird doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do it. On a societal level, what gender inequalities should be kept and which ones should be fought needs to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis as our culture evolves.

On an individual basis, though, the above argument does not apply. As I mentioned, people are different and probably follow a normal distribution for aggressiveness, emotionality, assertiveness, chivalry, etc. This means there are probably many women more aggressive than many men, many men more emotional than many women, and so on. How a couple could work out the balance will be unique to that couple, and it may very well carry a wide range of normal.

So when someone say: “men should get their balls back and be manly” or “women should be nicer and more girly” in a relationship, I would say: depends on who you are talking about, what their relationship is like, and on what circumstances you are basing your critique. If you are critiquing on the society as a whole, then I would say: good on ya, trying to shape our culture one facebook comment at a time!

Why I am writing again

Blogging has been a pretty big part of my life for a long time, up until some 3-4 years ago. Then for some reason, the blogging me really slowed down. Perhaps it’s because I got into medical school. Not because I become too busy (I did manage to get into Starcraft II and throw tons of hours into the epic interspecies galaxial war), but I think I couldn’t figure out how to fit blogging into my new identity as a doctor-to-be.

You see, I have more than once wrote something that genuinely pissed people off. Not that I was being mean or vulgar; some topics that I was passionate about were just too controversial to not cause a debate. But somehow being a doctor-to-be has caused me to really think twice before posting my opinion on debated topics such as religion, politics, abortion, etc. I guess I felt that since I am training to become a professional, I need to learn to be impartial and unbiased. Or maybe since I will become a searchable figure in a few years after I start practicing, I shouldn’t risk writing things that may alienate significant fraction of my potential patients.

And for the same reason of becoming a searchable name, I expect that it would be very challenging to separate my private life from my public one, so I hesitate to pour my day to day thoughts and feelings onto the pages for the world to see.

But every once and again, I miss the feeling of thinking out loud and hearing my thoughts become sound, watching my voice become words, and knowing my ideas will reach dozens or hundreds of pairs of eyes.

I am getting close to the next phase of my journey: residency. The application process is arguably less daunting than applying to med school, with fewer headaches (no MCAT) and a much better chance for success (overwhelming majority ((like 95% or something))get into a residency program). But more is on the line as well; at this stage of the game, many med students are married or in a serious relationship, and it would be very difficult to go out of province for 2 to 5 years of residency training.

So like how I used this blog to prepare for MCAT and med school interviews, I am going to use it to prepare for residency applications. I’ve been told by many upper year students that one way to prepare is to reflect on my experiences during med school that interviewers are bound to ask. Like dealing with difficult situations, breaking bad news, handling conflicts with colleagues, etc. I was really good at that for my application to med school 3 years ago because I’ve been blogging and reflecting day in day out for years. Now I think it’s time to pick that up again.

So, I will borrow what I said 3 years ago: here comes another page in zeroratio history!

有關台灣的一篇文章

臺灣有人看到這則新聞嗎?紐約時報的論壇:To Save Our Economy, Ditch Taiwan

其中重要的一段:

Today, America has little strategic interest in Taiwan, which is gradually integrating with China economically by investing in and forming joint ventures with mainland Chinese firms. The island’s absorption into mainland China is inevitable.

基本上,論點是「既然臺灣跟大陸在經濟上越走越近,吸收為大陸的一體是遲早的事,那美國不如提早賣這個人情給大陸,停止對台軍售和武力協防的合約。反正當初是在過時的冷戰思維下簽約的,取消正好符合時代變遷。這樣一來美國不但可以用這個籌碼吸引大陸和他配合對付北韓、伊朗等國,甚至要大陸把他們欠的債取消。立這樣的大功,歐巴馬鐵定連任。」

在美國,這篇文章引起不小的討論,大多是說大陸不可能給美國這麼好的甜頭,而不是質疑台灣臺灣傾中的走向。他們認為,就算台灣有人對這項提議抗議,也只是所謂的 “nationalists” (愛國分子) 而已。

臺灣人到底是想往哪裡走,從北美的角度實在是看不清。

Hello Scammer

I posted an ad on Craigslist, as I’ve done many times before, for an iPod touch I wanna sell. Little did I know, I would be running into the first scammer that I personally need to deal with…

The following is the email exchange, with my commentary in italic.

Gmail

32gb iPod touch 4th gen with warantee – $250 (Richmond)
9 messages


Janet <janetscoffy@gmail.com> Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 6:09 PM
Reply-To: janetscoffy@gmail.com
To: sale-y3khx-2664177043@craigslist.org
** CRAIGSLIST ADVISORY — AVOID SCAMS BY DEALING LOCALLY
** Avoid: wiring money, cross-border deals, work-at-home
** Beware: cashier checks, money orders, escrow, shipping
** More Info: http://www.craigslist.org/about/scams


Still have it for sale??


This message was remailed to you via: sale-y3khx-2664177043@craigslist.org
If this email is a scam or spam please flag it now:
http://www.craigslist.org/flag/?flagCode=31&smtpid=201110240109194B_kzNz94BGT6u-clUcQ4Q


Very legit and similar to what a buyer on Craigslist say. Nothing suspicious yet.

 


Billy  Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 6:18 PM
To: “janetscoffy@gmail.com” <janetscoffy@gmail.com>
Hi Janet,
Yup. Can we meet tomorrow afternoon at Richmond center?
[Quoted text hidden]

Janet <janetscoffy@gmail.com> Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 7:25 PM
To: Billy
Thanks for your reply, i really need to buy this and send to my boyfriend schooling in (Newcastle, Wyoming) in U.S.A as a  gift . I will offer you $280.00 CAD so as to close the auction as soon as possible. I will be paying using PayPal because i have a verified account with PayPal. So kindly get back with your PayPal email address so that i can make payment into your PayPal account ASAP. but if you don’t have a PayPal account you can set up an account with them just visit www.paypal.ca the process is just 3- 5minutes, Once payment clears, shipment will be handled by me through my Personal FedEx account, so you don’t have to bother about shipment. Get back to me if my approval is granted and the payment will be made immediately. I would like to see some pictures please.

Thanks.

Janet

[Quoted text hidden]

Here things start to get weird. First of all, WAY too much information with the boyfriend and verified account and instruction to get PayPal and FedEx account… Also, the $280 offer is strange. Why would anyone offer to beat my asking price just to “close the auction”? There are other sellers who are selling at $250, it’s not like mine is a very reduced price. Finally, using PayPal for Craigslist is an automatic red flag. But nothing definitely foul yet.


Billy Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:30 PM
To: Janet <janetscoffy@gmail.com>
Hi Janet,
How should I give you the iPod after your payment clears?
I will hold the iPod for you for $280 no prob. I posted pics on my ad posting http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/rch/ele/2664177043.html
Billy
[Quoted text hidden]

Here I was hinting at the hole in her proposal: since she said she would deal with shipping, that means I need to give her the iPod somehow. But why would you pay me extra money by PayPal and then meet me for the iPod? You don’t know how to work an ATM?


Janet <janetscoffy@gmail.com> Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:22 AM
To: Billy
Hey Billy goodmorning to you and how is your night ?? I will be including the shipping fee in the payment I am gonna send to your account and all you need now is to get back to me with your PayPal email address to receive the payment so that I can proceed with the payment…

Billy

[Quoted text hidden]

She did not answer my question. Sounds like she wants me to ship now. And she signed her email with MY NAME. What’s up with that?


Billy  Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:43 AM
To: Janet <janetscoffy@gmail.com>
Ok, it’s xxx@xxx
[Quoted text hidden]

At this point I just want to know how she plans to scam me. Cuz you can’t steal money just by having my PayPal account.


Janet <janetscoffy@gmail.com> Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:08 PM
To: Billy
Great and I will get back to you once I am done with payment and do you also have a cell phone number that I can text you at….Let me know once you do receive an email confirmation from PayPal …Regards

[Quoted text hidden]

Janet <janetscoffy@gmail.com> Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:26 PM
To: Billy
I have just made out the payment online now. Go and check the email  account you used in opening your PayPal  account a payment confirmation message from  PayPal have been sent there check the INBOX or SPAM messages you  should see it there. I will also like you to know that i am having some little problem with my FedEx account as i checked it online now  and i was asked to reactivate it which i can’t do that now as i have  to sort one or two thing out with them. So i am sorry as i won’t be  handling shipment through my FedEx account again. Please get the  postage done to the following address via post office using  (XpressPost via CANADA POST or via PUROLATOR Courier) and ship out the  item asap cos i have told my son to be expecting it. I have also  included $70 extra for Shipping.

Rich Hartinger

C/O Stanley Wooten 701 Salem Ave Lot 1

Wyoming

Newcastle

82701.

Please get back to me when you have posted the item. Thanks and i await your reply

Notice a few hilarious things: 1. she sounded surprised that her FedEx account is suddenly unavailable, although in her last email she already implied that I will do the shipping. 2. Who the hell will get a random seller to send a gift on their behalf? Does she expect me to giftwrap this or write a love letter for her? 3. She threw in more extra money just for fun. And 4. most of all, HER BOYFRIEND IS NOW HER SON.


Billy  Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:34 PM
To: Janet <janetscoffy@gmail.com>
Hi Janet,

The emails I got weren’t from PayPal, so I am afraid I cannot go through with this transaction.
Cheers,
Billy
[Quoted text hidden]

This is what the “PayPal” emails look like:

And:

Basically, she pretends that she already paid me by PayPal, but PayPal needs my shipment confirmation to “clear” the transaction. To encourage me to do it, she paid me $350 magic money that I will never see for a $250 item.

Here‘s what an anti-scam website has to say about this specific operation.

Supposedly there should be a fake threatening email about how she already paid and how I would get in trouble if I don’t ship the iPod, but I haven’t heard back from this scammer. Probably knows it’s a lost battle.

A few final thoughts:

1. I can see how a greedy person not too familiar with PayPal and Craigslist can fall victim to this scam, but you have to be pretty gullible. First fule of online shopping: If it’s too good to be true, it’s because it’s fake. 

2. I still have the iPod for sale. Any takers?

Golden Key UBC gets more activity than EVER

For those of you who don’t know, Golden Key is a society where the invitation-only membership is given to the top 15% of students academically. I made the mistake of joining it in 2nd year, wasting some $70 of registration fee, because of a misplaced sense of accomplishment when I got an invitation that started with “congratulations!”.

Long story short, I have not attended any event or did anything at all with the membership since I signed up. The organization seemed highly pretentious and juvenile at the same time. Pretentious in that the members share a grandiose delusion that they are superior than other students, and juvenile in that people collect points when they attend events. Earn points! I haven’t earned points for good behavior since I was 8 and could earn points for practicing piano. 10 points = 1 sticker. 10 stickers = $10.

Anyway, GK had been largely just a bad memory in the background that spews out an occasional spam about a launch BBQ (the attendance at which will earn you 5 points!), until today, when an unfortunate girl, probably fed up by getting the BBQ spam year after year, replied that she wanted to be removed from the mailinglist. Unbeknown to her, spamming the mailinglist about getting off the mailinglist would set off a chain reaction: people who also wanted to get off the list replied “me too”, and people who were originally patient with these spams got impatient after dozens of these “me too”‘s and wanted to get off, so the “me too” spams grew exponentially. Compounding these are 1) people who think they are smarter spamming the list the ways to properly unsubscribe (and these instructions grew more and more hostile as people continued to spam the list with “me too”‘s, and soon the top 15% of UBC students started to call each other stupid), 2) people who think all of these are funny spamming the list how they thought it was funny and posting cat pictures (no joke), and 3) the “proper way” to unsubscribe actually doesn’t work, so there was another wave of spams telling everyone how it actually doesn’t work.

My solution? Create a filter and make any message with the phrase “golden key” skip my inbox.

But I do think it was pretty funny and had to resist the temptation to spam everyone something witty…